Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats [Book Review]

Argumentation 18 (2):261-269 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/b:argu.0000024105.02302.3a

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. [REVIEW]Robert C. Pinto - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):261-269.
Walton's Scare Tactics Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. [REVIEW]A. Snoeck Henkemans - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (3).
Walton's Scare Tactics Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (3).
Evaluating Fear Appeals.Beth Innocenti - unknown
Scare Tactics: Arguments That Appeal to Fear and Threats.Douglas Walton - 2000 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments. [REVIEW]John Woods - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.
Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments.John Woods - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.
Douglas Walton (1995) Arguments from Ignorance. [REVIEW]Michael Wreen - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):51-55.
Douglas Walton (1995) Arguments from Ignorance.Michael Wreen - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):51-55.
Pinto, Robert C. (2001) Argument, Inference and Dialectic. [REVIEW]Jim Mackenzie - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):507-514.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
6 (#711,559)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A normative pragmatic model of making fear appeals.Beth Innocenti - 2011 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):273-290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references