Farewell to the Rule of Recognition?

Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (5):265-299 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I will argue that the rule of recognition, as it has been conceived by Hart, is either a redundant, and hence mostly useless, concept, or a concept with limited explanatory potential —in either case, at best a concept whose scope is, in contemporary legal systems, much narrower than Hart envis- aged. I will also argue that the rule of recognition, in one of its possible (and plausible) reformulations, can nevertheless play a significant, non-redundant role, but only if employed in a rather different way than the one proposed by Hart, as well as by much of post-Hartian positivist literatureResumen:En este artículo se argumenta que la regla de reconocimiento, tal como fuera concebida por Hart, es o bien un concepto redundante —y en consecuencia inútil— o un concepto limitado en su poder explicativo. En cualquier caso, se trata de un concepto cuyo alcance es, frente a los sistemas jurídicos contemporáneos, mucho más estrecho de lo que Hart pudo imaginar. De igual modo se argumenta que la regla de reconocimiento, en alguna de sus posibles (y plausibles) reformulaciones, puede tener a pesar de todo un papel significativo y no redundante, pero solamente si se emplea en un sentido radicalmente distinto al que propuso Hart o que se propone en buena parte de la literatura positivista posthartiana.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law and recognition: towards a relational concept of law.Ralf Michaels - 2017 - In Nicole Roughan & Andrew Halpin (eds.), In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press.
Kelsen, Quietism, and the Rule of Recognition.Michael Steven Green - 2008 - In Matthew D. Adler & Kenneth E. Himma (eds.), THE RULE OF RECOGNITION AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Oxford University Press.
solving The Chronological Paradox In Customary International Law: A Hartian Approach.David Lefkowitz - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 (1):128-148.
Is the Rule of Recognition Really a Conventional Rule?Julie Dickson - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (3):373-402.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.


Added to PP

10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?