In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. pp. 193-212 (2006)

Authors
Adrian M. S. Piper
Harvard University (PhD)
Abstract
By transcendental aesthetic, Kant means “the science of all principles of a priori sensibility” (A 21/B 35). These, he argues, are the laws that properly direct our judgments of taste (B 35 – 36 fn.), i.e. our aesthetic judgments as we ordinarily understand that notion in the context of contemporary art. Thus the first part of the Critique of Pure Reason, entitled the Transcendental Aesthetic, enumerates the necessary presuppositions of, among other things, our ability to make empirical judgments about particular works of art. These presuppositions are sensible rather than intellectual because on Kant’s view, all intellection that considers objects of any kind, whether abstract or concrete, must at base connect to actual, material objects with which we come into direct contact; and this we can do only through sensibility (A 19/B 33). Thus the following discussion explores what Kant claims must be true of us in order to make the sorts of aesthetic judgments we make, rather than any particular class or quality of aesthetic judgments itself. On Kant’s view, what must be true of us in order to make aesthetic judgments is not different from what must be true of us in order to make any other kind of judgment about empirical objects.
Keywords Sensibility  Judgment
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2008
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World (Review). [REVIEW]Lara Ostaric - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 147-148.
Kant and the Dilemma of Reason.Marshell Carl Bradley - 1984 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
Kant und die Logik des "Ich denke".Tim Henning - 2010 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 64 (3):331-356.
Aesthetic Judgment.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Significance of Taste: Kant, Aesthetic and Reflective Judgment.Robert B. Pippin - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):549-569.
Epistemological Sources of Kant's Aesthetic Theory.Theodore Ambrose Gracyk - 1984 - Dissertation, University of California, Davis
Kant, Adorno and the Work of Art.Murray W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
452 ( #16,522 of 2,432,956 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #18,129 of 2,432,956 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes