University of Chicago Press (2015)
Authors | |
Abstract |
In this latest book, renowned philosopher and scholar Robert B. Pippin offers the thought-provoking argument that the study of historical figures is not only an interpretation and explication of their views, but can be understood as a form of philosophy itself. In doing so, he reconceives philosophical scholarship as a kind of network of philosophical interanimations, one in which major positions in the history of philosophy, when they are themselves properly understood within their own historical context, form philosophy’s lingua franca. Examining a number of philosophers to explore the nature of this interanimation, he presents an illuminating assortment of especially thoughtful examples of historical commentary that powerfully enact philosophy. After opening up his territory with an initial discussion of contemporary revisionist readings of Kant’s moral theory, Pippin sets his sights on his main objects of interest: Hegel and Nietzsche. Through them, however, he offers what few others could: an astonishing synthesis of an immense and diverse set of thinkers and traditions. Deploying an almost dialogical, conversational approach, he pursues patterns of thought that both shape and, importantly, connect the major traditions: neo-Aristotelian, analytic, continental, and postmodern, bringing the likes of Heidegger, Honneth, MacIntyre, McDowell, Brandom, Strauss, Williams, and Žižek—not to mention Hegel and Nietzsche— into the same philosophical conversation. By means of these case studies, Pippin mounts an impressive argument about a relatively under discussed issue in professional philosophy—the bearing of work in the history of philosophy on philosophy itself—and thereby he argues for the controversial thesis that no strict separation between the domains is defensible.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2019 |
Buy this book | $19.54 used $36.02 new Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780226259796 022625965X 9780226259659 |
DOI | 10.7208/9780226259796 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Talking with Tradition: On Brandom’s Historical Rationality.Yael Gazit - 2020 - Open Philosophy 3 (1):446-461.
Similar books and articles
Interanimations: Receiving Modern German Philosophy. [REVIEW]Charlotte Alderwick - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):215-217.
Interanimations: Receiving Modern German Philosophy by Robert B. Pippin, And: Nietzsche, Psychology, and First Philosophy by Robert B. Pippin.Christopher Fowles - 2017 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 48 (2):286-294.
Reason and its Other: Rationalty in Modern German Philosophy and Culture.Dieter Freundlieb & Wayne Hudson (eds.) - 1993 - Berg.
Hegel on Ethics and Politics.Robert B. Pippin, Otfried Höffe & Nicholas Walker (eds.) - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Modern German Thought From Kant to Habermas: An Annotated German-Language Reader.Henk de Berg & Duncan Large (eds.) - 2012 - Camden House.
Spectrum Modern German Thought in Science, Literature, Philosophy and Art.Winfred Philipp Lehmann, Helmut Rehder & Hans Beyer - 1964 - Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
The Discovery of Historicity in German Idealism and Historism.Peter Koslowski (ed.) - 2005 - Springer.
Leibniz or Thomasius?: On the Roots of Kantian Criticism.Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (2):77-86.
Leibniz or Thomasius?: On the Roots of Kantian Criticism.Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel - 2007 - Idealistic Studies 37 (2):77-86.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-01-31
Total views
7 ( #1,067,321 of 2,505,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,203 )
2020-01-31
Total views
7 ( #1,067,321 of 2,505,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads