On Rejecting the Theory of Common Ancestry: A Reply to Hasker

Alvin Plantinga
University of Notre Dame
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,455
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa.Makmiller Pedroso - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (1):182-190.
Common Ancestry and Natural Selection.Elliott Sober & Steven Hecht Orzack - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):423-437.
Reply to Hasker.Gregory E. Ganssle - 1995 - International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):217-218.
Reply to Basinger on Power Entailment.William Hasker - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):87-90.
Evolution and Alvin Plantinga.William Hasker - 1992 - Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 44 (3):150-162.
The Problem of Natural Evil II: Hybrid Replies.Luke Gelinas - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):560-574.
Gladness, Regret, God, and Evil a Reply to Hasker.Wesley Morriston - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):401-407.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #263,650 of 2,272,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #410,656 of 2,272,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature