- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What Do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert
Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (3):630-630 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
What do we deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert.Louis P. Pojman & Owen Mcleod - 2001 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (3):393-393.
What do we deserve. A reader on justice and desert. Edited by Louis P. Pojman and Owen McLeod.André Berten - 2001 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 99 (3):511-513.
What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert.Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Equality and Desert.Shelly Kagan - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 298.
2t. Desert and Institutions.Owen McLeod - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 186.
t0. The Concept of Desert.John Kleinig - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 84.
C. the Rawlsian debate.Compensatory Desert - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
D. the role and significance of desert.Michael A. Slote - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 210.
25. Negating Positive Desert.Robert Goodin - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 234.
24. Merit and Meritocracy.Norman Daniels - 1999 - In Louis P. Pojman & Owen McLeod (eds.), What do we deserve?: a reader on justice and desert. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 224.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-23
Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)
6 months
1 (#1,516,603)
2017-02-23
Downloads
1 (#1,913,683)
6 months
1 (#1,516,603)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Why not be a desertist?: Three arguments for desert and against luck egalitarianism.Huub Brouwer & Thomas Mulligan - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2271-2288.
On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):455-473.
Choices, consequences and desert.Teun J. Dekker - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):109 – 126.
To each according to their effort? On the ethical significance of hard work.Tom Malleson - 2019 - Constellations 26 (2):257-267.
Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes? A Reply to Olsaretti.Huub Brouwer & Willem van der Deijl - 2018 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (3):399-405.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-grz79 uwo