Is Art Modern?

BJA 49 (1):1-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kristeller's article ‘The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics’ is a classic statement of the view, now widely adopted but rarely examined, that aesthetics became possible only in the eighteenth-century with the emergence of the fine arts. I wish to contest this view, for three reasons. Firstly, Kristeller's historical account can be questioned; alternative and equally plausible accounts are available. Secondly, ‘the modern system of the arts’ appears to have been neither a system nor an agreed upon entity, but only a historical construct of Kristeller's own making that matches up with no known historical reality. Thirdly, while the concept of the fine arts existed in the eighteenth century, the assumption that it had an impact on the rise of aesthetic theory remains unproven and unnecessary. A more satisfactory account of aesthetic thought in antiquity can be given, once the ‘fine-arts’ objection has been cleared away

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Continuity and discontiuity in the concept of art.Larry Shiner - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):159-169.
The Ancient and Modern System of the Arts.James O. Young - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1):1-17.
Eighteenth-century aesthetics and the reconstruction of art.Paul Mattick (ed.) - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Batteux: The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle.James O. Young - 2015 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by James O. Young.
A Fine Disregard: What Makes Modern Art Modern.Kirk Varnedoe - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (4):390-392.
Review of J. Kirk Varnedoe, A Fine Disregard: What Makes Modern Art Modern.Patrick Maynard - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (4):390-392.
Philosophies of arts: an essay in differences.Peter Kivy - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-20

Downloads
35 (#445,427)

6 months
9 (#436,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Schopenhauer's Aesthetic Ideology.Michel-Antoine Xhignesse - 2023 - In David Bather Woods & Timothy Stoll (eds.), The Schopenhauerian mind. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 127-40.
The Value of the Arts.Nigel Tubbs - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):441-456.
The Buck Passing Theory of Art.James O. Young - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (4): 421-433.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references