Concern for what we do to plants is pivotal for the field of environmental ethics but has scarcely been voiced. This paper examines how plant ethics first emerged from the development of plant science and yet also hit theoretical barriers in that domain. It elaborates on a case study prompted by a legal article on “the dignity of creatures” in the Swiss Constitution. Interestingly, the issue of plant dignity was interpreted as a personification or rather an “animalization of plants.” This sense of irony makes sense when one realizes that on scientific grounds the plant is a “second animal,” i.e., it differs from the animal in degree of life or some ethically-relevant criterion but not in nature. From the point of view of ethics however, plants should be defended for what they are by nature and not by comparison to external references: the ethical standing of plants cannot be indexed to animals. It is thus reckoned that to circumvent this odd fetishism, the plant ethics can only be adequately addressed by changing the theory of plant science. Common sense tells us this: plants and animals belong to radically different fields of perception and experience, a difference that is commonly captured by the notion of kingdom. In this paper we remind the ethical conversation that plants are actually incommensurable with animals because they are unsplit beings (having neither inside nor outside), i.e., they live as “non-topos” in an undivided, unlimited, non-centered state of being. It is concluded that the unique ontology of plants can only be addressed through a major change from object-thinking to process-thinking and a move from ego-centric to “peri-ego” ethics
Keywords Animal  Biocentrism  Epistemic standing  Plant  Post-ego   Topos
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-013-9439-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
On the Origin of Species.Charles Darwin - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Creative Evolution.Henri Bergson - 1911 - London: Palgrave-Macmillan.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Plants as Machines: History, Philosophy and Practical Consequences of an Idea.Sophie Gerber & Quentin Hiernaux - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (1):1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Plant Autonomy and Human-Plant Ethics.Matthew Hall - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (2):169-181.
Plant-Soul: The Elusive Meanings of Vegetative Life.Michael Marder - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (1):83-99.
Hierarchical Ordering in Plant Morphology.Robert W. Korn - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (4):227-244.
Growing Weed, Producing Knowledge An Epistemic History of Arabidopsis Thaliana.Sabina Leonelli - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (2):193 - 223.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #332,739 of 2,498,795 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,795 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes