Epicurean Ethics: Katastematic Hedonism

Edwin Mellen Press (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The fundamental problem of Epicurean philosophy is understood as the problem of being human in a mechanical universe, which brings out the philosophical importance of Epicurus and guards against treating him as a museum piece. This interpretation of Epicurean ethics is developed against the background of a critical discussion of earlier interpretations. Although the whole range of the tetrapharmakos is covered in the book, as well as the Epicurean social philosophy of justice and friendship, the argument focuses on Epicurus' understanding of the nature of pleasure, and pain and on the distinction between kinetic and katastematic pleasure.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notas sobre o conceito de prazer em Epicuro.Marcos Adriano Zmijewski - 2022 - Griot : Revista de Filosofia 22 (2):98-107.
Epicurus, the Garden, and the Golden Age.Gordon Campbell - 2010-09-24 - In Fritz Allhoff & Dan O'Brien (eds.), Gardening ‐ Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 220–231.
Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism.John J. Thrasher - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436.
Is Epicurus’ Ataraxia Individualistic?Ali Haydar Kutan - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 12:223-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
27 (#576,934)

6 months
5 (#837,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Pleasure.Leonard D. Katz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references