The Rationality of Religious Belief in a Postmodern Age

Dissertation, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (2000)

Abstract
Enlightenment evidentialism argues that a belief is rational for a person only if that person has sufficient evidence, arguments, or reasons for that belief. Sufficient evidence under this conception of rationality typically follows a classical foundationalist system which argues that the belief that P is rational if and only if P is self-evident, evident to the senses, or incorrigible, or inferable from a set of beliefs that are self-evident, evident to the senses, or incorrigible. In order to be rational about one's beliefs, a cognizer must be able to trace all of one's non-basic beliefs back to self-presenting basic beliefs which coerce one's non-basic beliefs. This approach to rationality carries with it profound implications for the rationality of theistic belief . Most non-theistic evidentialists argue that theistic belief does not satisfy the criteria for rationality because it typically fails to supply the sufficient evidence required to maintain it. ;By incorporating the valid insights of three contemporary religious epistemologists , it is argued that one can arrive at a model of rationality in which sufficient evidence for the rationality of one's beliefs does not require that a cognizer trace all of one's non-basic beliefs back to self-presenting basic beliefs that are thought to be coercive on all rationally attentive people. ;The proposed model of rationality argues that, on one level, sufficient evidence for the rationality of one's beliefs incorporates a reason-based conception of justification which may coincide with a cognizer's attempts to offer rationally convincing evidence that one's beliefs are true or certain. On another level, being rational about one's beliefs involves attempts to marshall enough of the appropriate kind, quality, and amount of evidence so as to be so rationally convinced of the truth or certainty of a given belief that one can no longer maintain a reasonable doubt
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,340
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bayle on the (Ir)Rationality of Religious Belief.Kristen Irwin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):560-569.
Rationality and Higher-Order Intentionality.Alan Millar - 2001 - Philosophy Supplement 49:179-198.
Swinburne and Plantinga on Internal Rationality.Alvin Plantinga - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (3):357-358.
Primitively Rational Belief-Forming Processes.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 180--200.
God and the Absence of Evidence.Stephen Grover - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
La voluntad de no creer.Manuel Iglesias - 2007 - Análisis Filosófico 27 (1).
Religious Evidentialism.Katherine Dormandy - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):63--86.
Religious Pluralism and the Rationality of Religious Belief.John Hick - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):242-249.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-02

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature