Religious Studies 46 (2):233-249 (2010)

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University
Assuming S₅, the main controversial premise in modal ontological arguments is the possibility premise, such as that possibly a maximally great being exists. I shall offer a new way of arguing that the possibility premise is probably true
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990400
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In E. Lepore & B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Śamkara's Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments.Alexander R. Pruss - 2001 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2):111-120.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nontraditional Arguments for Theism.Chad A. McIntosh - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (5):1-14.
Anselmian Theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
113 ( #91,113 of 2,432,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #60,174 of 2,432,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes