The ontological argument and the motivational centres of lives

Religious Studies 46 (2):233-249 (2010)
Abstract
Assuming S₅, the main controversial premise in modal ontological arguments is the possibility premise, such as that possibly a maximally great being exists. I shall offer a new way of arguing that the possibility premise is probably true
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412509990400
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In E. Lepore & B. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Śamkara's Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments.Alexander R. Pruss - 2001 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (2):111-120.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Anselmian Theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-04-30

Total downloads

57 ( #86,909 of 2,132,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,567 of 2,132,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums