Adrian Piper's aesthetic agency: Photography as catalysis for resisting neo-liberal competitive paradigms

Philosophy of Photography 10 (1):41-58 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary neo-liberal society is ruled by the market. Davies, Chen and Lentin and Titley show that its objectification and categorization founds a competitive notion of agency that disables subjective construction of self and intersubjective understanding of the world. As the market's rules and norms are set by white patriarchy, its competitive paradigm structurally disadvantages others. Art too is objectified and categorized by neo-liberal institutions, equally embedded in white patriarchal market structures and severely limiting democratic public access to a diverse artistic field, argue hooks, Mercer and Piper. Yet, Piper's artwork shows, art holds emancipatory potential. Defined as transforming experience, its ambiguity provides a structure for constituting agentic subjectivity and intersubjective signification processes, defying objective/objectifying market workings. Photography's specific qualities allow Piper to democratize access to the paradigm she proposes. Her artistic choices may thus found the potential to publicly construct a notion of aesthetic agency as resistance to the neo-liberal market.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Blackening Aesthetic Experience.Nicholas Whittaker - 2021 - The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (4):452–464.
Adrian Piper and the Rhetoric of Conceptual Art.Vid Simoniti - 2018 - In Cornelia Butler & David Platzker (eds.), Adrian Piper: A Reader. Museum of Modern Art Press. pp. 244-271.
Gender, Metaphor and the State.Marian Sawer - 1996 - Feminist Review 52 (1):118-134.
Democratic Agency and the Market Machine.Bernard Hodgson - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):3-14.
Democracy and the neo‐liberal promotion of arbitrary power.Barry Hindess - 2000 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):68-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-01

Downloads
23 (#705,261)

6 months
8 (#415,167)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?