Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362 (2007)

Mou Zongsan uses the highest moral principle “autonomy” to interpret Confucius’ benevolence and Mencius’ “inherent benevolence and righteousness”, focuses on the self-rule of the will. It does not do any harm to Mencius’ learning, on the contrary, it is conducive to the communication between Chinese and Western philosophies. If we stick to Kant’s moral self autonomy and apply it to interpreting Zhu Xi’s moral theory, similarly we will discover the implications of Zhu Xi’s “autonomy” in his moral learning. Therefore, it is inappropriate for Mou Zongsan to say that Zhu Xi’s ethics belongs to the autonomous one.
Keywords Zhu Xi   benevolence   Autonomous moral   righteousness   Mou Zongsan   Kant
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11466-007-0022-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,141
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1785/2002 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defending the Right To Do Wrong.Ori J. Herstein - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (3):343-365.
Mou Zongsan's Problem with the Heideggerian Interpretation of Kant.Sebastien Billioud - 2006 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (2):225–247.
Mou Zongsan San Xi Lun Lun Heng.Zebo Yang - 2006 - Fu Dan da Xue Chu Ban She.
The Many Faces of Autonomy.Diego Gracia - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):57-64.


Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #156,806 of 2,404,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #550,679 of 2,404,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes