Divine Conservation and Spinozistic Pantheism: PHILIP L. QUINN

Religious Studies 15 (3):289-302 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Robert A. Oakes argues that a doctrine central to, and partially constitutive of, classical theism implies a certain sort of pantheism. The doctrine in question is a modal form of the claim that God conserves in existence the world of contingent things; alternatively, it is the view that all contingently existing things are necessarily continuously dependent upon God for their existence. And the variety of pantheism at stake is a modal form of the thesis that all contingent things are, in some sense, included within the being of God

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
30 (#519,559)

6 months
4 (#1,004,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Does Continuous Creation Entail Occasionalism?: Malebranche.Andrew Pessin - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):413-439.
Does Continuous Creation Entail Occasionalism?Andrew Pessin - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):413-439.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references