Justice in the family: A defence of feminist contractarianism

Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):45–54 (2005)
Abstract
Jean Hampton argues that we can detect exploitation in personal relationships by thinking about what we would agree to were we to set aside the emotional benefits we receive from those relationships. Hampton calls her account "feminist contractarianism," but it has recently been critiqued as decidedly unfeminist, on the grounds that it is hostile to women's interests and women's values. Furthermore, Hampton's requirement that we imaginatively distance ourselves from our emotional connections to our loved ones--the key element in her contractarian test--is simply ad hoc. In this essay, I will evaluate these objections and offer a new justification for Hampton's test. I conclude that feminist contractarianism is not only a useful tool for detecting exploitation in the family, it is also deserving of its feminist label.
Keywords contractarianism  feminism  Hampton  justice  family
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00291.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,495
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Why Feminist Contractarianism?Ruth Sample - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (2):257–281.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Just Love in Live Organ Donation.Kristin Zeiler - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (3):323-331.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
73 ( #76,337 of 2,210,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #154,013 of 2,210,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature