Martina Reuter
University of Helsinki
ABSTRACTThe article compares Rousseau’s and Wollstonecraft’s views on the imagination. It is argued that though Wollstonecraft was evidently influenced by Rousseau, there are significant differences between their views. These differences are grounded in their different views on the faculty of reason and its relation to the passions. Whereas Rousseau characterizes reason as a derivative faculty, grounded in the more primary faculty of perfectibility, Wollstonecraft perceives reason as the faculty defining human nature. It is argued that contrary to what is often assumed, Wollstonecraft’s conception of the imagination is not primarily characterized by its Romantic features, but rather by the close affinity she posits between reason and the imagination. This close affinity has several consequences. One consequence is that she is less worried than Rousseau about the imagination wandering without external constrains, because she believes in reason’s ability to guide the imagination by choosing its objects. Ultimately the difference between Rousseau’s and Wollstonecraft’s views on the imagination helps us understand why she was a passionate philosopher of the Enlightenment while he was one of its first, perceptive and most articulate critics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2017.1334188
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,041
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination.Alan M. S. J. Coffee - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135.
A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals. [REVIEW]Richard Price - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. New York: Blackwell. pp. 733-734.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mary Wollstonecraft Och Autonomins Uppkomst.Martina Reuter - 2018 - Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift 53 (2-03):105-118.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Feminist Imagination.Jan Ellen Lewis - 2004 - Modern Intellectual History 1 (3):411-425.
Educational Relationships: Rousseau, Wollstonecraft and Social Justice.Morwenna Griffiths - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (2):339-354.
Introduction - Rousseau and Wollstonecraft: Nature Vs. Reason.Moira Gatens - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64:1.


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #492,127 of 2,410,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,938 of 2,410,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes