Looking from the Outside/In: Re-thinking Research Ethics Review [Book Review]
Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):193-204 (2011)
Abstract
This paper shares my reflections on the research ethics review process, from the point of view of both a qualitative researcher and a member of an institutional research ethics review board. By considering research ethics review, first as practice, then as policy, as a relationship and, finally, as a performance, I attempt to outline a new vision of research ethics, one that engages seriously with the relationship between receiving ethics approval, and conducting ethical researchDOI
10.1007/s10805-011-9139-y
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia.Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
Getting beyond form filling: The role of institutional governance in human research ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
Ethics review of social, behavioral, and economic research: Where should we go from here'.Raymond De Vries, Debra A. DeBruin & Andrew Goodgame - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):351 – 368.
Ethical considerations in geographic research: What especially graduate students need to know.Daniel A. Griffith - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):237 – 252.
A funny thing happened on the way to the ethics board: Studying the meaning of farm life for farm children. [REVIEW]Helene A. Cummins - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):175-188.
A troubled dance: Doing the work of research ethics review. [REVIEW]Susan A. Tilley - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):91-104.
Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects.Lisa Eckenwiler - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69.
ethics and/or Ethics in Qualitative Social Research: Negotiating a Path around and between the Two.Denise Turner & Rebecca Webb - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare (4):1-14.
The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee. [REVIEW]Katinka De Wet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):301-314.
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Students as research participants or as learners?Ling Shi - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):205-220.
The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-06-15
Downloads
48 (#245,874)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2011-06-15
Downloads
48 (#245,874)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Difference: Ethical Dilemmas of External Researchers.Jennifer Tatebe - 2015 - Journal of Academic Ethics 13 (3):229-237.
An Insider’s Moments of Confucian Ethical Conflict: Reflexivity as the “Middle Way” Response.Myra C. Y. Lee - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):299-316.
References found in this work
Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring.Joan Tronto - 1989 - In Alison M. Jaggar & Susan Bordo (eds.), Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing. Rutgers University Press. pp. 172--187.
If no means no, does yes mean yes? Consenting to research intimacies.Julia O'Connell Davidson - 2008 - History of the Human Sciences 21 (4):49-67.
