Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (3):193-204 (2011)

This paper shares my reflections on the research ethics review process, from the point of view of both a qualitative researcher and a member of an institutional research ethics review board. By considering research ethics review, first as practice, then as policy, as a relationship and, finally, as a performance, I attempt to outline a new vision of research ethics, one that engages seriously with the relationship between receiving ethics approval, and conducting ethical research
Keywords Research ethics  Informed consent  Qualitative research  Research relationships
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10805-011-9139-y
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsible Conduct of Research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Reasoning and the Review of Research Involving Human Subjects.Lisa Eckenwiler - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):37-69.
Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Students as Research Participants or as Learners?Ling Shi - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):205-220.


Added to PP index

Total views
48 ( #226,996 of 2,461,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,382 of 2,461,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes