Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):747-748 (2004)
Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) have not adequately supported the epistemic component of their proposal, namely, that God does not exist. A weaker, more probable hypothesis, not requiring that component – that the benefits of religious belief outweigh those of disbelief, even though we do not know whether or not God exists – is available. I counsel them to use Ockham's razor, eliminate their negative epistemic thesis, and accept the weaker hypothesis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Is a Complete Biocognitive Account of Religion Feasible?Lluís Oviedo - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):103-126.
Similar books and articles
Ockham's Razor, Encounterability, and Ontological Naturalism.J. M. Dieterle - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (1):51-72.
Ockham's Razor and the Anti-Superfluity Principle.E. C. Barnes - 2000 - Erkenntnis 53 (3):353-374.
Simplicity, Inference and Modeling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple.Arnold Zellner, Hugo A. Keuzenkamp & Michael McAleer (eds.) - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Ockham's Razor and the Identity of Indiscernables.Raja A. Bahlul - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:405-414.
Simpler Without a Simplest: Ockham's Razor Implies Epistemic Dilemmas.R. Sorensen - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):260-264.
Sharpening Ockham's Razor.Anne Cutler & Dennis Norris - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):40-41.
Justification as Truth-Finding Efficiency: How Ockham's Razor Works.Kevin T. Kelly - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):485-505.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #597,871 of 2,169,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,364 of 2,169,066 )
How can I increase my downloads?