Religion's evolutionary landscape needs pruning with ockham's razor

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):747-748 (2004)

Authors
Abstract
Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) have not adequately supported the epistemic component of their proposal, namely, that God does not exist. A weaker, more probable hypothesis, not requiring that component – that the benefits of religious belief outweigh those of disbelief, even though we do not know whether or not God exists – is available. I counsel them to use Ockham's razor, eliminate their negative epistemic thesis, and accept the weaker hypothesis.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x0440017x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,183
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
22 ( #367,855 of 2,237,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #54,252 of 2,237,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature