- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Will the real scientists please stand up? dead ends and live issues in the explanation of scientific knowledge
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):43-68 (1996)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Will the real Kant please stand up-The challenge of Enlightenment racism to the study of the history of philosophy.Robert Bernasconi - 2003 - Radical Philosophy 117:13-22.
Will the real sustainability concept please stand up?J. Cairns - 2004 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 49:52.
Will the Real You Please Stand Up. [REVIEW]Joseph C. Kunkel - 1986 - Teaching Philosophy 9 (2):180-181.
The Treachery of the Commonplace.Mary Sirridge - 2009 - In Noël Carroll & Lester H. Hunt (eds.), Philosophy in the Twilight Zone. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 58–76.
Will a real evolutionary ecologist please stand up?Michael T. Ghiselin - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (3):355-359.
Christopher Norris, Fiction, Philosophy and Literary Theory: Will the Real Saul Kripke Please Stand Up?Robert Piercey - 2009 - Philosophy in Review 29 (1):57.
Will the real objects of politics please stand up? [REVIEW]Adrian Ivakhiv - 2015 - Global Discourse 6 (1-2):148-151.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#340,493)
6 months
12 (#243,520)
2009-01-28
Downloads
48 (#340,493)
6 months
12 (#243,520)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Understanding Interests and Causal Explanation.Petri Ylikoski - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Helsinki
Dynamics of theory change in chemistry: Part 2. Benzene and molecular orbitals, 1945–1980.Stephen G. Brush - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (2):263-302.
Interests, folk psychology and the sociology of scientific knowledge.Petri Ylikoski - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):265 – 279.
References found in this work
Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism.Larry Laudan - 1987 - American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1):19 - 31.
Discipline and bounding: The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate.Steven Shapin - 1992 - History of Science 30 (90):333-369.
De-centring the ‘big picture’: The Origins of Modern Science and the modern origins of science.Andrew Cunningham & Perry Williams - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (4):407-432.
II.1 The Pseudo-Science of Science?Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (2):173-198.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-w2v2s uwo