Concepts of Digital Objects : Digital Records and the Relational Objects of Yuk Hui

Abstract

The writings of Yuk Hui, bringing together technical and philosophical insights, provides new theory for the digital, something desired by many in archival research. The aim of this study is to assess the use of Hui’s theories on digital objects and web ontologies as a unifying theory for archival studies, looking at the concept of digital records in particular. Two types of ontology are needed in order to understand digital objects according to Hui: ontologies which relates to the technical language and hierarchies of knowledge representation, like metadata; Ontology, which is the question of Being in the tradition of Heidegger’s phenomenology, the understanding of what it is to be in the world. Both of these ontologies are needed to account for the nature of the digital object. Further, digital objects are produced and constituted through their relations, which can be divided into discursive and existential relations. Digital objects must be approached both as technical formal entities, and as beings in the world. The first register is common, the second – more existential approach – is rarely applied. Using a metatheoretical and hermeneutic method, different conceptions of digital records are discussed, in order to find commonalities and possibilities in relation to Hui’s theory. The digital record as: a process of becoming, information as affordance, context, temporality and evidence are all related to and structured through the application of Hui’s perspective. The thesis ends with the contribution of a possible redefinition of digital records: A digital record is constituted and concretised as material by discursive and existential relations, that taken together function as a persistent representation. Further, Hui’s digital object theory is suggested as a structuring and unifying theory. In relation to digital records Hui’s theory on digital objects can function as a metatheoretical measure, and a method of critical reading.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

What is a Digital Object?Yuk Hui - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (4):380-395.
From Analog Objects to Digital Devices.Jorge William Montoya - 2019 - Philosophy Today 63 (3):717-730.
Irremediability: on the very concept of digital ontology.J. Clemens & A. Nash - 2019 - In Amand Lagerkvist (ed.), Digital Existence. Routledge. pp. 29-60.
Representation in digital systems.Vincent C. Müller - 2008 - In P. Brey, A. Briggle & K. Waelbers (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. IOS Press. pp. 116-121.
ISR is Still a Digital Ontology.Bruce Long - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (3):649-664.
Phenomenology of digital-being.Joohan Kim - 2001 - Human Studies 24 (1-2):87-111.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).
Understanding Digital Ethics: Cases and Contexts.Jonathan Beever, Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick - 2019 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick.
Digital hermeneutics: an outline. [REVIEW]Rafael Capurro - 2010 - AI and Society 25 (1):35-42.
Circles: Networks of Reading.Massimo Lollini - 2015 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 4 (1):1-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-30

Downloads
14 (#985,798)

6 months
5 (#626,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is a Digital Object?Yuk Hui - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (4):380-395.
Irremediability: on the very concept of digital ontology.J. Clemens & A. Nash - 2019 - In Amand Lagerkvist (ed.), Digital Existence. Routledge. pp. 29-60.

Add more references