- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
University Research Ethics Committees as learning communities: Identifying and utilising collaboratively produced knowledge in decision-making
Research Ethics 9 (4):166-174 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 5. Collective Decision-Making and Research Ethics Committees.Sarah Jl Edwards - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (1):19-23.
Voluntariness of consent to research: a preliminary empirical investigation.P. S. Appelbaum, C. W. Lidz & R. Klitzman - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (6):10-14.
Research Ethics Committee and Integrity Board Members’ Collaborative Decision Making in Cases in a Training Setting.E. Löfström, H. Pitkänen, A. Čekanauskaitė, V. Lukaševičienė, S. Kyllönen & E. Gefenas - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-25.
How idiocultures and warrants operate independently in New Zealand health ethics review boards.Martin Tolich - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (2):67-81.
Identifying and addressing nonrational processes in REB ethical decision-making.Simon Nuttgens - 2021 - Research Ethics 17 (3):328-345.
Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions.Elizabeth A. Boyd & Lisa A. Bero - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):415-435.
IRBs and ethically challenging protocols: views of IRB chairs about useful resources.N. Sirotin, L. E. Wolf, L. M. Pollack, J. A. Catania, M. M. Dolcini & B. Lo - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (5):10-19.
How IRBs make decisions: should we worry if they disagree?Sharon Kaur - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):230-230.
How IRB leaders view and approach challenges raised by industry-funded research.R. Klitzman - 2013 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (3):9-17.
The Roles of Research Ethics Committees: Implications for Membership.David Hunter - 2007 - Research Ethics 3 (1):24-26.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-07
Downloads
55 (#283,716)
6 months
2 (#1,448,741)
2013-12-07
Downloads
55 (#283,716)
6 months
2 (#1,448,741)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 1. The Rationale for Ethics Review of Research by Committee.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):147-150.
University Research Ethics Committees — A Summary of Research into Their Role, Remit and Conduct.Anthea Tinker & Vera Coomber - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (1):5-11.
Should Research Ethics Committees Be Observing the Law or Working by Ethical Principles?Charles Warlow - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (1):23-26.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo