The not altogether social construction of emotions: A critique of harré and Gillett

Are emotions like sneezes, unwilled, mechanical, or are they like judgments; are they entirely social constructions? Harré and Gillett believe that emotions are exclusively judgments. We argue that their view misses something important. Imagine a person quaking in anger. Both we and Harré and Gillett believe that he is angry only if he has made an implicit judgment, such as I have been transgressed against. But it is the quaking, not the judgment, that gives authenticity and force to the expression of anger. The quaking does not clarify what the actor means but rather it clarifies the relation of the actor to the meaning of his display. What makes it a genuine expression of anger and not a joke or performance is that the quaking is beyond the will. Bodily displays are not necessary to make expressions authentic; anything that shows that the expression is beyond the will will do, for instance, obsessive thoughts, intrusions, or an inability to concentrate. For Harré and Gillett emotions both as displays and feelings do not merely embody judgments but are also speech acts. We argue that an expression, a feeling or flitting through the mind, cannot be a speech act since only the overt can fit into the convention, the strictures of a community. Nor is the display merely a speech act. Since for an emotional display to be genuine it must slip from the lips unbidden. Further, a speech act account makes the emotions arbitrary; they imply that the set of possible emotions is open. We think, on the other hand, that only some sorts of judgments can become part of an emotion; judgments that relate to things that are important enough in a particular culture that judgment display and feeling are linked together involuntarily
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-5914.00073
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,807
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ekman's Basic Emotions: Why Not Love and Jealousy?John Sabini & Maury Silver - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (5):693-712.
Psychoanalytic Sociology and the Interpretation of Emotion.Simon Clarke - 2003 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33 (2):145–163.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Social Construction of Emotions in the Bhagavad Gītā.Kathryn Ann Johnson - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (4):655-679.
Baseball and Hot Sauce: A Critique of Some Attributional Treatments of Evaluation.John Sabini & Maury Silver - 1980 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 10 (2):83–95.
Are Emotions Significant in Psychology Only as Motives?Rom Harré - 1997 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (4):503–505.
On the Possible Non-Existence of Emotions: The Passions.John Sabini Andmaury Silver - 1996 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (4):375–398.
Embarrassment: A Dramaturgic Account.Maury Silver, John Sabini, W. Gerrod Parrott & Maury Silver - 1987 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 17 (1):47–61.
The Social Construction of Envy.Maury Silver & John Sabini - 1978 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8 (3):313–332.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
31 ( #183,385 of 2,214,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #40,426 of 2,214,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature