Postmodernism and philosophy of science: A critical engagement

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):426-445 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines critically two related claims: first, that postmodernism and philosophy of science depend on each other in a manner similar to the Enlightenment and Romanticism, that is, they respond and dispute each other's claims; and second, that what underlies and emanates from both postmodernism and philosophy of science is a political perspective and commitment. These claims suggest not only the possibility of translating from one area to the other when they are critically engaged with each other but also the potential for using both areas simultaneously to transform and possibly improve the human condition. By emphasizing the similarities between science/philosophy of science and postmodernism the essay explores the ways in which these two enterprises or groups of people can learn from one another and benefit from each other's insight.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Postmodernism and Philosophy of Science: A Critical Engagement.Raphael Sassower - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):426-445.
Critical Realism: Essential Readings.Jonathan Joseph - 2001 - Historical Materialism 8 (1):507-517.
Synthetic philosophy.Eric Schliesser - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (2):19.
On the relations between (neo-classical) philosophy of science and logic.Roberto Festa - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):511-520.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
45 (#344,810)

6 months
4 (#1,006,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raphael Sassower
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Citations of this work

Incredulity towards Lyotard: a critique of a postmodernist account of science and knowledg.Robert Nola & Gürol Irzik - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):391-421.
V tieni postmoderny.Tatiana Sedová - 1994 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 1 (1):17-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references