Background Justice over Time: Property-Owning Democracy versus a Realistically Utopian Welfare State

Analyse & Kritik 35 (1):193-212 (2013)

Abstract

In Justice as Fairness, Rawls presents a case for property-owning democracy which heavily depends on a favourable comparison with welfare state capitalism. He argues that WSC, but not POD, fails to realise ‘all the main political values expressed by the two principles of justice’. This article argues that Rawls’s case for POD is incomplete. He does not show that POD is superior to other conceivable forms of WSC. In order to present a serious contender, I sketch what I call a realistically utopian welfare state that guarantees the fair equality of political liberties and opportunity and that maximises the situation of the worst-off via a kind of participation income. The main aim of the article is to give credibility to the claim that RUWS is not obviously worse than POD by Rawlsian standards and therefore deserves a fair hearing in further research

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
5 (#1,213,140)

6 months
4 (#162,461)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Similar books and articles

How (Not) to Criticise the Welfare State.Christian Schemmel - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4):393-409.
Property-Owning Democracy and the Idea of Highest-Order Interests.Gavin Kerr - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (3):455-482.
Sen on Rawls’s “Transcendental Institutionalism”: An Analysis and Critique.Alan Thomas - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (3):241-263.
Three Rawlsian Routes Towards Economic Democracy.Martin O'Neill - 2008 - Revue de Philosophie Économique 9 (1):29-55.