Population Health Metrics 10 (19) (2012)

Authors
S. Andrew Schroeder
Claremont McKenna College
Abstract
When disability-adjusted life years are used to measure the burden of disease on a population in a time interval, they can be calculated in several different ways: from an incidence, pure prevalence, or hybrid perspective. I show that these calculation methods are not equivalent and discuss some of the formal difficulties each method faces. I show that if we don’t discount the value of future health, there is a sense in which the choice of calculation method is a mere question of accounting. Such questions can be important, but they don’t raise deep theoretical concerns. If we do discount, however, choice of calculation method can change the relative burden attributed to different conditions over time. I conclude by recommending that studies involving disability-adjusted life years be explicit in noting what calculation method is being employed and in explaining why that calculation method has been chosen.
Keywords disability-adjusted life years  QALY  discount rate  health measurement  philosophy of economics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Qualité de la vie et affectation des ressources.Michael Lockwood - 1987 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 92 (3):307 - 328.
How Lives Measure Up.Molly Gardner & Justin Weinberg - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (1):31-48.
Three Other Motivational Factors.Kent Bach - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):651-652.
Disability, Minority, and Difference.Elizabeth Barnes - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-355.
Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Mark Greene & Steven Augello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-24

Total views
179 ( #48,192 of 2,333,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,090 of 2,333,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes