A Computational Model of Pragma-dialectics as a Tool for its Analysis and Evaluation

Informal Logic 35 (3):342-377 (2015)


The overall goal of this paper is to show that computational modelling of argumentation theories is a useful tool to deepen them. Specifically, it provides a basic computational formalization of part of Pragma-dialectics’ model of a critical discussion, which serves as a basis for analyzing this influential theory of argumentation. Such analysis reveals some weaknesses and leaves some questions opened for Pragma-dialectics. Particularly, it shows that the model of a critical discussion is not independent of the model of reasoning/inference chosen, because, while it performs differently with different models of reasoning, it does not work well with some of them.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

29 (#399,260)

6 months
2 (#258,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

The Formalization of Critical Discussion.Erik Krabbe - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):101-119.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Question of Truth.David Botting - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):413-434.
Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics.Leo Groarke - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):1-16.
Pragma-Dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
The Impact of Argumentation on Artificial Intelligence.David Godden - 2006 - In F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser & M. A. van Rees (eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 287-299.