Popper versus Peirce on the probability of single cases

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):177-180 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Van rooijen and Mayr versus Popper: Is the universe causally closed?Tom Settle - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):389-403.
The autonomy of probability theory (notes on Kolmogorov, rényi, and popper).Hugues Leblanc - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):167-181.
Swann versus Popper on induction: An arbitration.Tom Settle - 1990 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3):401-405.
Popper’s Measure of Corroboration and P.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs029.
Don't Take Unnecessary Chances!Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 2002 - Synthese 132 (1/2):9 - 26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#376,851)

6 months
11 (#232,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Expanding Universe.Arthur Eddington - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (30):219-220.
How to establish non-conventional isochrony.Ferrel Christensen - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):49-54.
Are some Propensities Probabilities?Tom Settle - 1973 - In Radu J. Bogdan & Ilkka Niiniluoto (eds.), Logic, Language, and Probability. Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 115--120.
Propensity: Popper or Peirce?Richard W. Miller - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):123-132.

Add more references