Laws of nature: Ante res or in rebus?

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599408573497
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Peirce on Continuity and Laws of Nature.Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou - 1997 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33 (3):646 - 678.
Platonism and Laws: A Reply to Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou.James Robert Brown - 1994 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (3):243 – 246.
Models: The Blueprints for Laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
Are 'Ex Ante' Enhancements Always Permissible?S. Matthew Liao - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):23 – 25.
Added to PP index
2009-02-01

Total downloads
64 ( #87,037 of 2,210,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,854 of 2,210,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature