A Response to Penders: The Disvalue of Vagueness in Authorship

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):17-17 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Virus of Vagueness in Authorship.David Shaw - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (3):361-362.
The Value of Vagueness in the Politics of Authorship.Bart Penders - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):13-15.
The Trojan Citation and the “Accidental” Plagiarist.David Shaw - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):7-9.
Response.Robert King - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):99-99.
Response.Frank Brennan - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):217-218.
Response.Tony Wild - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):101-102.
Response.Miriam Taylor Gomez - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4):375-376.
Response.Christopher James Ryan - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):103-104.
In that case: response.G. Annals & J. O'Malley - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David M. Shaw
University of Basel

Citations of this work

The Ninth Circle: Who and What Do We Trust In Today’s World?Michael Ashby - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):7-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Value of Vagueness in the Politics of Authorship.Bart Penders - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (1):13-15.

Add more references