On Misunderstanding Heraclitus: the Justice of Organisation Structure

Philosophy of Management 18 (2):157-167 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Writers on organisational change often refer to the cosmology of Heraclitus in their work. Some use these references to support arguments for the constancy and universality of organisational change and the consignment to history of organisational continuity and stability. These writers misunderstand the scope of what Heraclitus said. Other writers focus exclusively on the idea that originated with Heraclitus that the universe is composed of processes and not of things. This idea, which has been particularly associated with Heraclitus’s thought from the time of Plato, does indeed provide a rich source of insights into organisational analysis, not least the current trends towards giving proper attention to processual studies of organisational change. Yet there is some uncertainty as to whether Heraclitus actually said that the universe was composed exclusively of processes rather than things, and even if that was what he thought, he intended his ideas on flux to be understood not in isolation but in the context of other aspects of his cosmology. Writers on organisational change seldom make reference to this wider context. Heraclitus was a rational but also a religious thinker. A central element in his thought was the notion of divine Justice, which to a Greek of his era meant the order of the universe. Remote as his Olympian theology may seem today, it sets a crucial and entirely rational context for understanding his ideas about flux. It means that ideas about continuity and stability were quite as important in Heraclitus’s cosmology as his more commonly quoted ideas about change. This paper sets out an overview of Heraclitus’s philosophy, insofar as it appears to have potential relevance to organisational analysis, and discusses how far it supports or contradicts the ideas that organisational change scholars have drawn from it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time for a change : a polemic against the presentism/eternalism debate.Lawrence B. Lombard - 2006 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O’Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press.
On 'Logos' in Heraclitus.Mark A. Johnstone - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47:1-29.
Parmenides and the Question of the One.Damian Ilodigwe - 2016 - WAJOPS WEST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 18:114-138.
How to Speak Kata Phusin.Jessica Elbert Decker - 2019 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):263-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-05

Downloads
42 (#390,437)

6 months
15 (#185,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Man and logos: Heraclitus’ secret.A. V. Halapsis - 2020 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 17:119-130.
Editorial: Questioning Assumptions.Wim Vandekerckhove - 2019 - Philosophy of Management 18 (2):113-115.

Add more citations