Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of early nineteenth-century Edinburgh

Annals of Science 32 (3):219-243 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This account of the conflict between phrenologists and anti-phrenologists in early nineteenth-century Edinburgh is offered as a case study in the sociological explanation of intellectual activity. The historiographical value and propriety of a sociological approach to ideas is defended against accounts which assume the autonomy of knowledge. By attending to the social context of the debate and the functions of ideas in that context one may construct an explanation of why the conflict took the course it did



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technoscience.Ursula Klein - 2005 - Perspectives on Science 13 (2):139-141.


Added to PP

48 (#246,317)

6 months
5 (#154,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Presentist History for Pluralist Science.Hasok Chang - 2021 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 52 (1):97-114.
Foundations of social epistemics.Alvin I. Goldman - 1987 - Synthese 73 (1):109 - 144.
Shahryari on Bloor and the Strong Program.Finn Collin - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3):70-76.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Class, Codes and Control.Basil Bernstein - 1972 - British Journal of Educational Studies 20 (2):236-237.
The Edinburgh Phrenology Debate: 1803–1828.G. N. Cantor - 1975 - Annals of Science 32 (3):195-218.

View all 9 references / Add more references