Merleau-Ponty’s implicit critique of the new mechanists

Synthese (Suppl 9):1-25 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I argue (1) that what (ontic) New Mechanistic philosophers of science call mechanisms would be material Gestalten, and (2) that Merleau-Ponty’s engagement with Gestalt theory can help us frame a standing challenge against ontic conceptions of mechanisms. In short, until the (ontic) New Mechanist can provide us with a plausible account of the organization of mechanisms as an objective feature of mind-independent ontic structures in the world which we might discover – and no ontic Mechanist has done so – it is more conservative to claim that mechanistic organization is instead a mind-dependent aspect of our epistemic strategies of mechanistic explanation.

Similar books and articles

Mechanistic explanation without the ontic conception.Cory Wright - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy of Science 2 (3):375-394.
The Logic of the Chiasm in Merleau-Ponty's Early Philosophy.Robin M. Muller - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4.
Saving the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance.Beate Krickel - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 68:58-67.
Merleau-Ponty.Stephen Priest - 1998 - Routledge.
Une signification nouvelle. Le riflessioni sull'animalità del "primo" Merleau-Ponty.Lucia Zaietta - 2016 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 7 (2):225-239.
Merleau-Ponty, Hermeneutics, and Postmodernism.Shaun Gallagher & Thomas Busch (eds.) - 1992 - State University of New York Press.


Added to PP

502 (#20,663)

6 months
48 (#28,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations