Bernard Robertson and G. A. [Tony] Vignaux, Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom [Book Review]

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2-3):215-217 (2001)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1017961821760
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Forensic Expertise and Judicial Practice: Evidence or Proof?Aleksandar Apostolov - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1147-1150.
Si Fa Jian Ding de Su Song Hua.Yuhua Li - 2006 - Zhongguo Ren Min Gong an da Xue Chu Ban She.
Science, Truth, and Forensic Cultures: The Exceptional Legal Status of DNA Evidence.Michael Lynch - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):60-70.
All That Glitters Isn't Gold.Osagie K. Obasogie & Troy Duster - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):15-18.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,086,526 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #656,535 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature