Ruling out Lucky Proofs

Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96 (2):262-277 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

:According to Leibniz’s theory for contingent truths about created individuals, this kind of truth cannot be proved in a finite number of steps, because the analyses of the concepts corresponding to these individuals required for the proofs proceed to infinity. Some commentators pointed out that such truths.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Infinite analysis, lucky proof, and guaranteed proof in Leibniz.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Paul Lodge - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2):222-236.
Zur diskussion.[author unknown] - 1999 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81 (3):316-328.
Messeri on the Lucky Proof.Stephen Steward - 2017 - The Leibniz Review 27:21-30.
La logica di Leibniz, i possibili e l’infinito.Sergio Bernini - 2002 - Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 8:21-51.
Remarks on the Lucky Proof Problem.Marco Messeri - 2017 - The Leibniz Review 27:1-19.
Law, World and Contingency in the Philosophy of Leibniz.Reginald Osburn Savage - 1986 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Explanatory Rationalism and Contingent Truths.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):237 - 242.
On the number of steps in proofs.Jan Kraj\mIček - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):153-178.
On me number of steps in proofs.Jan Krajíèek - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 41 (2):153-178.
Kant's Philosophy of Geometry.William Mark Goodwin - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-28

Downloads
12 (#1,094,538)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references