Risky business: Nuclear workers, ethics, and the market-efficiency argument

Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):1-23 (2002)
: Workers generally face higher levels of pollution and risk in their workplace than members of the public. Economists justify the double standard (for workplace versus public exposures to various pollutants) on the grounds of the compensating wage differential (CWD). The CWD, or hazard-pay premium, is the increment in wages, all things being equal, that workers in hazardous environments receive, as compared to other workers. Economists defend the CWD by asserting that workers willingly trade safety for extra money. This essay (1) examines the theory behind the CWD, (2) presents and evaluates economists' Market-Efficiency Argument for the CWD, (3) offers several reasons for questioning the CWD, and (4) applies the Market-Efficiency Argument to a real-world case, that of U.S. nuclear workers. The essay concludes that this argument fails to justify the CWD, at least in the case of U.S. nuclear workers.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/ETE.2002.7.1.1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,126
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Framing Ethical Acceptability: A Problem with Nuclear Waste in Canada.Ethan Wilding - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):301-313.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

25 ( #203,945 of 2,171,803 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,803 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums