The State of the UBI Debate: Mapping the Arguments for and against UBI

Basic Income Studies 17 (2):213-237 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and bargaining. Likewise, they focus on political questions around welfare state reforms, redistribution, taxation and funding sources, democratic citizenship, and the prospects for cross-party policy coalitions. By providing an overview of the thematic pillars of the UBI debate, this article helps researchers and activists locate and orient themselves within the wider spectrum of opinion on UBI.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classical Liberalism and the Basic Income.Matt Zwolinski - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):1-14.
Why a UBI Will Never Be High Enough.Joseph Heath - 2024 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 41 (2):289-305.
Why a UBI Will Never Be High Enough.Joseph Heath - 2024 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 41 (2):289-305.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-22

Downloads
41 (#377,675)

6 months
22 (#159,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations