The All too Human Welfare State: Freedom between Gift and Corruption


Can taxation and the redistribution of wealth through the welfare state be conceived as a modern system of circulation of the gift? But once such a gift is institutionalized, regulated and sanctioned through legal mechanisms, does it not risk being perverted or corrupted, and/or not leaving room for genuinely altruistic motives? What is more: if the market’s utilitarian logic can corrupt or ‘crowd out’ altruistic feelings or motivations, what makes us think that the welfare state cannot also be a source of corruption? To explain the standard answers to the abovementioned questions as well as their implications I will first re-examine two opposing positions assumed here as paradigmatic examples of other similar positions: on the one hand, Titmuss’s work and the never-ending debate about it; on the other, Godbout’s position, in-so-far as it shows how Titmuss’s arguments can easily be turned upside down. I will then introduce and reinterpret Einaudi’s “critical point” theory as a more complex and richer anthropological explanation of the problems and answers considered herein. Through the analysis of these paradigmatic positions I will develop two interrelated arguments. 1) The way these problems are posed as well as the standard answers to them are: a) subject to fallacies: the dichotomy fallacy and the fallacy of composition; b) too reductive and simplistic: we should at least try to clarify what kind of ‘gift’ or ‘corruption’ we are thinking about, and who or what the ‘giver’, the ‘corrupter’, the ‘receiver’ and/or the ‘corrupted’ party are. 2) The answers to these problems cannot be found by merely following a theoretical approach, nor can they be merely based on empirical evidence; instead, they need to take into account the forever troublesome, ambiguous and unpredictable matter of human freedom.

Download options


External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

83 (#143,374)

6 months
23 (#38,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Institutional Analysis and the Gift: An Introduction to the Symposium.Paolo Silvestri - 2020 - Journal of Institutional Economics 16 (4):1-10.
Hobbes On Corruption.Adrian Blau - 2009 - History of Political Thought 30 (4):596-616.
La Raison du Don.Jean-luc Marion - 2004 - Bijdragen 65 (1):5-37.
Ancient Corruption in Modern Organizations.Thomas Taro Shinozaki Lennerfors - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:61-66.
Happiness and the Welfare State.Bo Rothstein - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):441-468.
The World of the Gift.Jacques Godbout & Alain Caillé - 1998 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Happiness and the Welfare State.Bo Rothstein - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):441-468.
Institutional Corruption and the Rule of Law.Paul Gowder - 2014 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 9 (1):84-102.
The Gift of Oneself From the Perspective of New Readings of “The Gift” by Marcel Mauss.Maria Do Socorro Malatesta Freitas - 2014 - Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration 19 (1-2):39-46.