A Note on Choice Principles in Second-Order Logic

Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):339-350 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Zermelo’s Theorem that the axiom of choice is equivalent to the principle that every set can be well-ordered goes through in third-order logic, but in second-order logic we run into expressivity issues. In this note, we show that in a natural extension of second-order logic weaker than third-order logic, choice still implies the well-ordering principle. Moreover, this extended second-order logic with choice is conservative over ordinary second-order logic with the well-ordering principle. We also discuss a variant choice principle, due to Hilbert and Ackermann, which neither implies nor is implied by the well-ordering principle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-25

Downloads
71 (#236,726)

6 months
13 (#219,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paolo Mancosu
University of California, Berkeley
Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New V, ZF and Abstraction.Stewart Shapiro & Alan Weir - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):293-321.
Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
Zermelo and set theory.Akihiro Kanamori - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):487-553.
The mathematical import of zermelo's well-ordering theorem.Akihiro Kanamori - 1997 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):281-311.

View all 9 references / Add more references