Social science as the idea: Peter Winch and Wittgenstein’s heritage

Filozofija I Društvo 21 (3):145-162 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

U ovom radu izlaze se kratak pregled Vincovog poimanja drustvenih nauka kao neodvojivih od filozofije i Vitgenstajnovog uticaja na ovakvo shvatanje. Autor ukazuje da su brojne primedbe kriticara za subjektivizam i relativizam uzrokovane nedovoljnom razradom i generalizacijama koje nalazimo u ranim Vincovim tekstovima, a koji su bili predmet njegove samokritike u kasnijem periodu. Osim tematizovanja standardno prihvacenog znacaja Vitgenstajnovih pojmova jezickih igara, zivotnih formi i sledjenja pravila po drustvenu teoriju, u tekstu se naglasava znacaj manje tematizovanih koncepata preglednog prikaza i aspektnog sagledavanja po Vincovo poimanje mogucnosti razumevanja drugih kultura.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2298/fid1003145s

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and the social sciences: critical reflections concerning Peter Winch’s interpretations and appropriations of Wittgenstein’s thought.Richard E. Flathman - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (2):1-15.
Winch, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a critical social theory.Nigel Pleasants - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):78-91.
Wittgenstein among the sciences: Wittgensteinian investigations into the "scientific method".Rupert J. Read - 2012 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Edited by Simon Summers.
Can social science be just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Winch’s philosophical bearings.Brian Fay - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):50-62.
Winch and Wittgenstein on understanding ourselves critically: Descriptive not metaphysical.Nigel Pleasants - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):289 – 317.
On the question whether language has a social nature: Some aspects of Winch and others on Wittgenstein.Margaret Gilbert - 1983 - Synthese 56 (3):301 - 318.
Winch’s double-edged idea of a social science.Philip Pettit - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):63-77.
Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking.Anne Warfield Rawls - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4):396-418.
Studies in the philosophy of Wittgenstein.Peter Winch (ed.) - 1969 - New York,: Humanities P..
Value and understanding: essays for Peter Winch.Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) - 1990 - New York: Routledge.
Wittgenstein and spengler vis-à-vis Frazer.Aydan Turanli - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):69-88.
Iv. understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.
Winch and Instrumental Pluralism.Berel Dov Lerner - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):180-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
42 (#377,400)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Can we understand ourselves?Peter Winch - 1997 - Philosophical Investigations 20 (3):193–204.
Relativism, reality and philosophy.John Horton - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):19-36.

Add more references