Field on truth: how complex is too complex?

Abstract

In a reading group, we’ve been working through the first three parts of Field’s Saving Truth from Paradox, by the end of which he has presented his core proposals. At this point, we’ve now rather lost the will to continue – for this is an astonishingly badly written book, which makes ridiculous demands on the patience of even a sympathetic reader. It so happened that it fell to me to introduce the last two chapters in Part III, Ch. 17 in which Field rounds out his key technical construction, and Ch. 18, ‘What Has Been Done’. I talked mainly about the latter. Here, for what they are worth, are some very quickly written reflections on what has and hasn’t been achieved

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

This is the Title of This Thesis.Hiroshi Aoyama - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
So truth is safe from paradox: now what?Stewart Shapiro - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):445-455.
Truth's saviour?Kevin Scharp - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):183-188.
Stock and bulk in the latest Newton scholarship.H. Floris Cohen - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Science 51 (4):687-701.
The Phenomena of Love and Hate.D. W. Hamlyn - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (203):5 - 20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-04

Downloads
66 (#85,934)

6 months
66 (#238,863)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Eldridge-Smith
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references