Clinical study reflections: Another view commentary on: “Raising suspicions with the food and drug administration: Detecting misconduct”

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):705-711 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Federal regulations are the minimum requirements for conducting clinical studies. Some innovation would improve the situation of many involved in these studies, including: study subjects, those who monitor studies, and clinical investigators as well as Institutional Review Boards. Respecting patient and whistle-blower input; appreciating research staff contributions; and implementing a systems and partnership approach would foster quality and advance clinical research

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Impact of Institutional Review Boards on cancer research.B. J. Kennedy - 1984 - Journal of Medical Humanities 5 (1):27-32.
Seeking Retrospective Approval for a Study in Resource-Constrained Liberia.Jemee K. Tegli - 2017 - In Doris Schroeder, Julie Cook, François Hirsch, Solveig Fenet & Vasantha Muthuswamy (eds.), Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations. New York: Springer. pp. 115-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-13

Downloads
18 (#829,194)

6 months
4 (#1,007,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references