Open Peer Commentary Looking at comorbidity through the glasses of neuroscientific memory research: A brain-network perspective

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):170-171 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Extending the network perspective on comorbidity.Brian D. Haig & Frances M. Vertue - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):158-158.
The network perspective will help, but is comorbidity the question?Wendy Johnson & Lars Penke - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):162-163.
Comorbidity as an epistemological challenge to modern psychiatry.Miro Jakovljević & Željka Crnčević - 2012 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 5 (1):1-13.
Open Peer Commentary.Frédéric Bassoa & Olivier Oullierb - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5).
Is Communication Emerging or Sui Generis?L. Leydesdorff - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):111-112.
What is the source of activation for working memory?John Jonides & Edward Awh - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):741-742.
Rem sleep, dreaming, and procedural memory.Michael Schredl - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):80-81.
The principles and practices of Peer review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
1 (#1,899,057)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references