Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):255-264 (2008)

Susan Stuart
University of Glasgow
My aim in this paper is to go some way towards showing that the maintenance of hard and fast dichotomies, like those between mind and body, and the real and the virtual, is untenable, and that technological advance cannot occur with being cognisant of its reciprocal ethical implications. In their place I will present a softer enactivist ontology through which I examine the nature of our engagement with technology in general and with virtual realities in particular. This softer ontology is one to which I will commit Kant, and from which, I will show, certain critical moral and emotional consequences arise. It is my contention that Kant’s logical subject is necessarily embedded in the world and that Kant, himself, would be content with this view as an expression of his inspired response to the ‘‘scandal to philosophy... that the existence of things outside us... must be accepted merely on faith’’ [Bxl]. In keeping with his arguments for the a priori framing of intuition, the a priori structuring of experience through the spontaneous application of the categories, the synthesis of the experiential manifold, and the necessity of a unity of apperception, I will present an enactivist account of agency in the world, and argue that it is our embodied and embedded kinaesthetic engagement in our world which makes possible the syntheses of apprehension, reproduction and recognition, and which, in turn, make possible the activity of the reproductive or creative imagination.
Keywords Computer Science   Library Science   User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction   Ethics   Technology Management   Management of Computing and Information Systems
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-008-9175-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

How the Body Shapes the Mind.Shaun Gallagher - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):59-84.
Kant on Representation and Objectivity: An Essay on the B-Deduction.Adam Benjamin Dickerson - 2001 - Dissertation, University of New South Wales (Australia)
The Second Step of the B‐Deduction.Frederick Rauscher - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):396-419.
A Study of Kant's Theoretical Philosophy and Idealism.Camilla Serck-Hanssen - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Kant's Thinker.Patricia Kitcher - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
On Strawson on Kantian Apperception.Dennis Schulting - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):257-271.


Added to PP index

Total views
498 ( #14,454 of 2,438,881 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,704 of 2,438,881 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes