Happiness within modern societies: a comparison of ideal types, eudaimonism and consumer societies.

Abstract

Modern-day societies seem to be dominated by a hedonistic approach to happiness. A less short-term and more process-based definition of happiness - eudaimonism - has been proposed by Aristotle. Can this definition of happiness exist in consumer societies as proposed by Zygmunt Bauman and how can we begin to explore such a question? This essay will provide a comparison between two ideal types: eudaimonism and consumer society. With this comparison, we hope to provide a conceptual framework for further research within this subject.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Spinoza’s Strong Eudaimonism.Brandon Smith - 2023 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 5 (3):1-21.
Eudaimonism, Virtue, and Self‐Sacrifice.Jesse Couenhoven - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (1):7-14.
Garve's Eudaimonism.Michael Walschots - 2020 - In Udo Roth & Gideon Stiening (eds.), Christian Garve (1742–1798) Philosoph und Philologe der Aufklärung. De Gruyter. pp. 171-182.
Kantian Eudaimonism.E. Sonny Elizondo - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (4):655-669.
The Merits of Eudaimonism.John E. Hare - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (1):15-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-17

Downloads
51 (#101,528)

6 months
51 (#302,321)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Stuijt
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references