Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (4):424-450 (2016)

This paper is a critique of the current US patent system along general consequentialist lines. I present a pro tanto case against it because of its effects on scientific inquiry. The patent system is often thought to be justified because it provides incentives to innovate. I challenge this concern. Economists and legal scholars have spent a good portion of time analyzing particular aspects of the patent system. I here synthesize their work, showing how it amounts to a pro tanto moral case against patents. This is the case even though patents are said to incentivize innovation, its disclosure, and its transfer to interested parties. I explore all of these possibilities, finding them to only weakly support the institution of patent rights. Juxtaposing this weak case for patents along with various problems that patents cause for science, we find a pro tanto case against our current patent system. To my knowledge, no one has tried to synthesize the various concerns I raise, with particular attention to not only the patent’s system purported ability to incentivize innovation, but also to disclose and transfer technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X16666022
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Biotechnology and the Utilitarian Argument for Patents.Michele Svatos - 1996 - Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (2):113.
Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice.Axel Gosseries, Alain Marciano & Alain Strowel (eds.) - 2008 - Basingstoke & N.Y.: Palgrave McMillan.
Patents and Incentives to Innovate.Paul Belleflamme - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (2):267-288.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Surgical Patents and Patients — the Ethical Dilemmas.Tadeusz Tołłoczko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):61-69.
Can Drug Patents Be Morally Justified?Dr Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.
Can Drug Patents Be Morally Justified?Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.
Patents and Ethics: Is It Possible to Be Balanced?Jacek Spławiński - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):71-74.
Principle, Practice and Persona in Isambard Kingdom Brunel's Patent Abolitionism.David Miller - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Science 41 (1):43-72.
The Moral Justifiability of Patents.Sigrid Sterckx - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (2):249-265.
GM Crops: Patently Wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.
Scientific Realism and the Patent System.David Resnik - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (1):69-77.
Patents and Incentives to Innovate.Paul Belleflamme - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (2):267-288.
Why Are Software Patents so Elusive? A Platonic Approach.Odin Kroeger - 2011 - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 5 (1):57-70.


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #659,881 of 2,432,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #466,747 of 2,432,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes