Diskussion/Discussion. Replies to the Critics of A Theory of Social Action

Analyse & Kritik 8 (2):229-241 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is a reply to the critical reviews of the author’s A Theory of social Action by Anton Leist, Marvin Belzer, and Julian Nida-Rümelin in this journal. As to Leist’s main criticisms, which concern the notions of social action, social practical reasoning, individualism, and social norms, they are argued to be incorrect and unjustified. Belzer’s criticisms are on the whole well taken, and in fact all of them have been noted by the author in his later work.Belzer does not, however, consider these newest analyses and improvements. Nida-Rümelin presents some comments on the relationships between collective preferences and we- intentions. These points are correct.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate intention and corporate action.Raimo Tuomela - 1993 - Analyse & Kritik 15 (1):11-21.
We-mode in Theory and Action.Raul Hakli, Kaarlo Miller & Pekka Mäkelä - 2023 - In Miguel Garcia-Godinez & Rachael Mellin (eds.), Tuomela on Sociality. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 11-35.
We-Intentions and Social Action.Raimo Tuomela & Kaarlo Miller - 1985 - Analyse & Kritik 7 (1):26-43.
Intentional Social Action and We-Intentions.Marvin Belzer - 1986 - Analyse & Kritik 8 (1):86-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
9 (#1,270,032)

6 months
2 (#1,448,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raimo Tuomela
Last affiliation: University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references