Author’s Response: Identifying a Philosophy and Methods for Second-Order Science

Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):39-45 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upshot: The work that scientists do, particularly social scientists, is currently constrained by their conception of science. Expanding the conception of science would lead to more innovative work and more rapid social progress

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Second-Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods.S. A. Umpleby - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):16-23.
Observer Effects in Research.M. C. Bateson - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):31-32.
The Promise and Prospects of Second-Order Science.D. Rousseau - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):37-38.
Science Is not Value-free.J. Stewart - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):28-29.
Do We also Need Second-order Mathematics?J. P. Van Bendegem - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):34-35.
Do We Need a Second-Order Science?M. A. Notturno - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):23-26.
New Challenges to New Science.J. J. Hu - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):26-28.
Beware False Dichotomies.P. A. Cariani - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):472-475.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-15

Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stuart Umpleby
George Washington University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references