La importancia de la discusión metodológica entre Dworkin y el positivismo

Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (1):25-53 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I analyse different strategies of defence –derived from Hart´s PostScript– used by the legal positivists against the numerous objections made by Ronald Dworkin. Against the abandonment of the dispute proposed by Liam Murphy, I show that the methodological and conceptual discussion between Dworkin and legal positivism is vital for the dworkinian theoretical purposes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Explaining Theoretical Disagreement and Massive Decisional Agreement: The Justificatory View.Stefan Sciaraffa - 2012 - Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (6):165-189.
The "Hart-Dworkin" debate : a short guide for the perplexed.Scott J. Shapiro - 2007 - In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--49.
Rewriting Hart's Postscript: Thoughts on the Development of Legal Positivism.Tom Campbell - 2011 - Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1 (5):23-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
2 (#1,823,102)

6 months
2 (#1,445,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Facundo García Valverde
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references