Appearance vs. Reality as a Scientific Problem

Philosophic Exchange 35 (1):34-67 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The history of science is replete with ideals that involve some criterion of completeness. One such criterion requires that physics explain how the appearances are produced in reality. This paper argues that it is scientifically acceptable to reject this criterion, along with all other completeness criteria that have been proposed for modern science.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Appearance and Reality of Mind.Demian Whiting - 2016 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 37 (1):47-70.
Idealism and Scepticism.Anthony Brueckner - 2011 - Theoria 77 (4):368-371.
A Few Problems Concerning the Criterion of Truth.Tao Delin - 1980 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 11 (3):12-17.
Problem of the Criterion.Kevin McCain - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.
Metaphisics as a Study of True Reality.Natalia Martishina - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:141-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-24

Downloads
13 (#1,035,489)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bas C. Van Fraassen
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is consciousness a brain process.Ullin T. Place - 1956 - British Journal of Psychology 47 (1):44-50.
A Model‐Theoretic Account of Representation.Steven French - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Causality and complementarity.Niels Bohr - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (3):289-298.
Why the quantum?Jeffrey Bub - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):241-266.
Does the Bohm theory solve the measurement problem?Abraham D. Stone - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.

View all 8 references / Add more references