Sola Experientia?—Feyerabend's Refutation of Classical Empiricism

Philosophy of Science 64 (Supplement):385-395 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feyerabend's “Classical Empiricism” draws on a 17th century Jesuit argument against Protestant fundamentalism. The argument is very general, and applies to any simple foundationalist epistemology. Feyerabend uses it against Classical Empiricism—roughly, the view that what is to be believed is exactly what experience establishes, and no more—which he identifies as among other things Newton's “dogmatic ideology.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On What Empiricism Cannot Be.Alexander Paul Bozzo - 2016 - Metaphilosophy 47 (2):181-198.
The Empirical Stance.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 2002 - Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
119 (#154,923)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bas C. Van Fraassen
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism.Monton Bradley & Fraassen Bas C. Van - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):405 - 422.

Add more citations

References found in this work

VIII. Classical Empiricism.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1971 - In John W. Davis & Robert E. Butts (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 150-170.

Add more references